Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Re: Packaging libgig 0.7.1

[Christian S. <chr...@ep...>]

Es geschah am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 18:04 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb:
> > Is there a reason to replace pkglib_LTLIBRARIES by lib_LTLIBRARIES?
>
> No special reason. IIRC I was having some trouble with the libtoolization
> which seemed to be solved by that change. Something regarding the target
> shared libraries not having the .so suffix or else. I've never and
> probably never will grok the misteries of the autotools karma :)
>
> BTW, do you know the difference between pkglib_ and lib_ prefixes? The
> later seems to be more standard :)

I wasn't sure either, but AFAIK the only difference is the target directory=
=2E=20
=46rom the libtool doc ("9.3.2 Building Libtool Libraries"):

>  Automake predefines the variable `pkglibdir', so you can use=20
>  pkglib_LTLIBRARIES to install libraries in $(libdir)/@PACKAGE@/. =20

That was the only difference I found.

So, it's ok, go ahead and commit it.

CU
Christian