|
From: Christian S. <chr...@ep...> - 2004-07-02 15:15:38
|
Es geschah am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 11:30 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb: > Please note that the C++ source code wasn't touched in any way. On > attachment you may find a complete diff-patch of the proposed changes. Looks fine, except: >>diff -duPr libgig-0.7.0/libgig.spec.in libgig-0.7.1/libgig.spec.in [snip] >+Copyright: LGPL That's GPL, not LGPL at the moment. [snip] >+URL: http://www.linuxsampler.org/ That should be http://stud.fh-heilbronn.de/~cschoene/projects/libgig/ for the moment, I will move the site to http://www.linuxsampler.org/ though when I have time (in a couple of weeks). > diff -duPr libgig-0.7.0/src/Makefile.am libgig-0.7.1/src/Makefile.am > --- libgig-0.7.0/src/Makefile.am 2004-05-03 15:16:58.000000000 +0100 > +++ libgig-0.7.1/src/Makefile.am 2004-07-01 10:19:08.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ > -# set the include path found by configure > -INCLUDES= $(all_includes) > - > # to prevent compile errors on some systems > AM_CXXFLAGS = -pedantic > > -pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libgig.la > -libgig_la_SOURCES = RIFF.cpp RIFF.h DLS.cpp DLS.h gig.cpp gig.h > +libgigincludedir = $(includedir) > +libgiginclude_HEADERS = RIFF.h DLS.h gig.h > + > +lib_LTLIBRARIES = libgig.la Is there a reason to replace pkglib_LTLIBRARIES by lib_LTLIBRARIES? CU Christian |