[Linuxsampler-devel] Re: Packaging libgig 0.7.1

[Christian S. <chr...@ep...>]

Es geschah am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 11:30 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb:
> Please note that the C++ source code wasn't touched in any way. On
> attachment you may find a complete diff-patch of the proposed changes.

Looks fine, except:

>>diff -duPr libgig-0.7.0/libgig.spec.in libgig-0.7.1/libgig.spec.in
[snip]
>+Copyright:	LGPL

That's GPL, not LGPL at the moment.

[snip]
>+URL:		http://www.linuxsampler.org/

That should be http://stud.fh-heilbronn.de/~cschoene/projects/libgig/ for the 
moment, I will move the site to http://www.linuxsampler.org/ though when I 
have time (in a couple of weeks).

> diff -duPr libgig-0.7.0/src/Makefile.am libgig-0.7.1/src/Makefile.am
> --- libgig-0.7.0/src/Makefile.am	2004-05-03 15:16:58.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgig-0.7.1/src/Makefile.am	2004-07-01 10:19:08.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> -# set the include path found by configure
> -INCLUDES= $(all_includes)
> -
>  # to prevent compile errors on some systems
>  AM_CXXFLAGS = -pedantic
>  
> -pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libgig.la
> -libgig_la_SOURCES = RIFF.cpp RIFF.h DLS.cpp DLS.h gig.cpp gig.h
> +libgigincludedir = $(includedir)
> +libgiginclude_HEADERS = RIFF.h DLS.h gig.h
> +
> +lib_LTLIBRARIES = libgig.la

Is there a reason to replace pkglib_LTLIBRARIES by lib_LTLIBRARIES?

CU
Christian