Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Qsampler 0.0.2 released!

[Mark K. <mk...@co...>]

Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> Hi Mark,

> Current linuxsampler CVS HEAD is pretty unstable, and somewhat broke
> regarding compability with client/server interface as it was before June
> 13th's revolution :)
> 
> The packages on my site and qsampler.sf.net are related to the
> pre-revolutionary period, only.

OK, I won't bother until you folks get to a point where you think it's 
worth my time. Let me know when.

> How about setting up a bugtracker on ls.org ? Something like Mantis
> Bugtracker (http://www.mantisbt.org), exactly the same tool the ardour and
> alsa teams are using. PHP/MySQL required.
> 
> Cheers.

I like this idea a lot. I think there could be different basic areas 
that we log both bugs and feature requests:

1) LS
2) QS
3) Sound card/Alsa
4) MIDI
5) Gig file compatibility

I'm sure there are others.

I think having a bug tracker is great since the data doesn't get lost or 
forgotten.

Rosegarden also uses a bug tracker, but it looks different than the Alsa 
bug tracker, so maybe that's another option. Personally I like the Alsa 
one a bit more as it's more searchable, but maybe that's just the way 
they've set it up. I think it's part of Sourceforge, or seems to be.

Also, Gentoo uses a bug tracker that's quite involved. Don't know if 
that's an option to look at.

Cheers,
Mark