Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Latest CVS commit

[Christian S. <chr...@ep...>]

Es geschah am Montag, 14. Juni 2004 23:35 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb:
> Hi Christian,
>
> > First off my latest commit may break things a bit, so I uploaded a CVS
> > snapshot tarball before:
> >
> > 	http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html
>
> I've noticed you tagged the cvs snapshot tarball with something like
> version 0.2.0. However the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE on top configure.in still
> references a 0.1 version. The later is where I pick the linuxsampler

Feel free to fix it. Actually 0.1 was meant for the old single channel version 
(there's also a tag in CVS for this) and 0.2 was meant since then for the 
multi channel version of LS.

> package version tag for my own snapshots in http://www.rncbc.org/ls/.

Well, it would make more sense to place it on the LS website, don't you think? 
I don't like the situation to have various resources, this especially 
accounts to the protocol draft. There should only be one reource for the 
protocol doc otherwise we end in chaos.

> > Rui, I propose you also upload a snapshot of a qsampler version which
> > fits the best to that LS version, so that users have a working
> > environment while we implement the new network protocol draft and deal
> > with the transition due to this.
>
> No problem.
>
> Both qsampler 0.0.1 and liblscp 0.1.9.98 alpha-releases are fundamentally
> working with the latest cvs20040613 snapshot. The same is valid with
> current qsampler and liblscp CVS HEAD. If I'm not terribly mistaken, those
> are even supposed to work on any forthcoming linuxsampler server changes,
> as far as of latest LSCP draft specification (v.08). So don't worry.

Current LS version from CVS HEAD is quite unstable and the protocol transition 
will bring situations where GUI and engine won't work together, so that's why 
I made the snapshot from yesterdays version.

> Nevertheless, I'm planning to package next alpha-releases of qsampler
> 0.0.2 and liblscp 0.1.9.99, starting tomorrow, based on current CVS HEAD
> of course.
>
> Just to have a baseline, just before your "leave" ;)

Fine.

CU
Christian