Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Load Progress meter, Was: [ANNOUNCE] QSampler 0.0.1 released!

[Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...>]

Hi benno

>
> I think both event based load progress infos and INSTRUMENT_STATUS are
> way too messy for this simple purpose of showing a progress meter.
>

Sorry to disagree, but the INSTRUMENT_STATUS approach is the least
intrusive, development wise. It just adds a single variable to the server
channel instance, just one field to the LSCP channel info response (small
change in the doc), and the client takes all responsability on what to do
with it.

IMO Qsampler would be happier to call GET CHANNEL INFO more than once,
which it already does, instead of a specific LOAD INSTRUMENT loop.

But who am I to disagree :)

On the server side, I think your current solution is perfectly compatible
with mine.

Cheers,
-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rn...