Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Sampler quality comparison...

[<be...@ga...>]

I did not interpret your message as a feature request.
it's just that a decent softsampler should support independent
sample rates for libraries and audio output and since
this feature is very easy to implement and does not use additional
CPU when library sample rate = audio card sample rate 
so I see no reason not to implement it :)
I'm still wondering why GSt does not support it.

Mark a question: if you have a sound card that can do up to 96Khz
(44,48,88,96).
Assume you use a 44.1kHz GIG.
What happens if you want to work with higher sample rates because
your other audio files are all using this higher sample rate ?
As you said in the library SR=44kHz, souncard SR=48kHz you experience
the nasty pitch transpose effect.

But if you use 88kHz on the soundcard ?
Can GSt avoid pitch transpose in that case since it's just twice
the original sample rate (44.1kHz) ?
Or does it play all notes at twice of the pitch ?

just curious  :)

PS: please when replying reply only to the list otherwise the poster
always gets two messages.

cheers,
Benno



Scrive Mark Knecht <mk...@co...>:

> be...@ga... wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> > A few points on the matter:
> > 
> 
> Benno,
>     I was only relating a story. I was not asking for a feature request 
> or any changes to your development plans.
> 
>     If you guys *want* to support stuff like this then that's cool, but 
> please remember that I did not request it. If it's there eventually I 
> *may* use it, of course.
> 
> Good luck,
> Mark
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.gardena.net