Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Roadmap (was: Latest CVS commit)

[<be...@ga...>]

Mark keep in mind that GSt shows you mono voice count while LS shows you
stereo voice count.
So be sure to multiply LS  voices by two when comparing them with
GSt voices.
So basically 12 LS voices means 24 GSt voices.
Of course with release samples voice count will go up in LS but as said
the LS streaming engine is powerful enough to deliver the performance
which is comparable to GSt.

BTW: just back from NAMM, grat show, had interesting meetings regarding LS
will tell you guys more here on the list tomorrow.
I'm still tired of a total of 24h trip + 9h of time lag so I need to
get some sleep.

cheers,
Benno
http://www.linuxsampler.org





Scrive Mark Knecht <mar...@co...>:
> 
> Currently, that piano piece uses about 90 voices max in GSt, while the
> same piece uses only 10-12 voices in LS today. With no release samples
> you would not expect a piano (without sustain) to every use more than 10
> notes, and indeed it doesn't. However, once release samples are included
> the faster melodic runs can end up with many voices active in the
> release state with just a few new notes in the key press state. (Active
> state? Note on state? What term should I use?)
> 
> I think that doing very much benchmarking before release samples are
> included is only going to lead to doing it again. In the piano ogg
> above, what you hear from LS today is only 10-15% of what GSt is doing
> with the same MIDI file.
> 
> - Mark


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.gardena.net