|
From: Tobias E. <t.e...@gm...> - 2004-01-11 16:40:16
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: lin...@li... > [mailto:lin...@li...]On Behalf Of > be...@ga... > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:57 AM > To: Linux-Sampler > Subject: RE: [Linuxsampler-devel] Win32-Integration-Proposal > > > About Rewire: > this post seems rather discouraging, their license seems > incompatible with > open source: > http://techweb.rfa.org/pipermail/portaudio/2003-April/001827.html > > I still think a VST windows network frontend for LS is the way to go > (at least during the initial phase). > there are tons of VST hosts and wrappers so I think a VST module would > make many of the windows audio users happy. > > Tobias, comments ? Sounds pretty good... I have done a little bit of work with VSTs (was thinking about developing my own vst-host before I went off with the asio2ks project) - i'm not really that much of a gui-designer - and a vst-host needs some good gui. I think a VST-instrument needs a good gui also, but someone else could contribute there, as I really don't have any experience with QT... If you guys think this is ok, I'd like to do some stuff for the network layer and perhaps even the vst-wrapper for the win32- part. I'd use rtp for the audio-signals (same stuff that is used for VoIP), there's also a draft for midi over rtp, but I'm not sure if there's any other prot that would be better for midi... I have not invested that much of time looking at the ls-control- prot-spec yet, I'd need to do this the next couple of days... Tobias |