[Linuxsampler-devel] Re: [ardour-dev] atomic.h

[Paul D. <pa...@li...>]

>> >there? Ok, it doesn't look good to include kernel headers in user space
>> >applications, but on the other hand the user might already have a 'better' 
>> >version of atomic.h by using a more recent kernel version.
>> 
>> 1) correct, including kernel headers is not OK in a user space app
>> 2) if there are any improvements to be made to atomic.h for any
>>     particular architectures, we'll be happy to merge the in
>> 3) i don't think JACK itself uses any atomic stuff at all anymore. could
>>     be wrong there.
>
>It doesn't, but it probably should for some platforms.

really? off-hand, i can't think of anything that requires it. can you?