|
From: Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...> - 2003-12-30 17:20:03
|
> Rui, if you still insist on a C based API, then implement it yourself > right after we agreed about a final version of the protocol. But I > definitely think> it would be much better, easier and more convenient > for you to implement the communication by using the Qt facilities > (qsocket AFAIK). I don't really see much sense for you to write a C > API and to bind that in your C++ GUI code. > OK. Fair enough. I can start on both tasks (api and gui) as soon as the protocol rfc comes out. My initial idea for this (C) API is just about wrapping that protocol with a higher level programming layer, which the gui is only an application example. Of course, a command line shell should be considered too. However this is only one side of the problem--the client side, IIUC. Someone has to implement the server side of the protocol... Anyway, I'm eager to start working... can hardly wait to :) Cheers, a bright new year is coming... -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rn...@rn... |