|
From: Mark K. <mar...@co...> - 2003-12-22 16:55:24
|
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 04:22, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Es geschah am Sonntag, 21. Dezember 2003 23:04 als Mark Knecht schrieb: > > I hadn't tested LS seriously since MIDI velocity support was added, > > so I'm starting with that. The good news is that it works. The semi-bad > > news is that overall volumes are much, much lower. A peak of -6db in GSt > > will come out about -18db in LS. > > I guess you're speaking about the overall volume of LS, right? If yes, I will > add a command line switch for the global volume in LS with my next commit. > You're absolutely right, that the volume is a bit low on many machines, we > just set it that low, to avoid distortions with some sound cards. With the > command line option you will be able to raise the overall level and when Rui > finished our initial GUI you will be able to set such things by just doing > some clicks. > > CU > Christian > Christian, I think it makes lots of sense right now to keep the volume low. I you had been planning on adding a command line switch for volume, that's fine, but I'm not asking for it. Things are fine the way they are. I was just reporting data, not asking for changes. By way of comparison, I spent a lot of time Sunday afternoon playing with levels in GSt and dealing with some distortions there. I ended up finding that the level differences between LS and GSt weren't that different if I wanted GSt to not distort on high polyphony counts, so maybe things aren't that far off of a good setting right now. Far more preferred would be the MIDI hookup command line switch. That's still a pain as I change gig files... ;-) Cheers, Mark |