|
From: Mark K. <mar...@co...> - 2003-11-25 02:43:28
|
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 19:17, Marek Peteraj wrote: > What i was talking about was - it has to sound like Gst if you want it > to sound like Gst. But it can sound like anything else, or custom. My > point was - flexibility. > > What we're aiming at AFAIK is to provide 100% .gig support, not Gst > support. We just want to take full advantage of the .gig format, > anything beyond that could be considered as reverse-engineering Gst(or > any other app) which is forbidden. > > what i was trying to propose was to make the velocity system as flexible > as possible from the start, so that it would handle virtually any kind > of situation, custom settings, or that it could be used in conjunction > with virtually any sampler velocity emulation, not just Gst. I have no problem with anything you wrote. > > > > > If LS doesn't play gig files so that they sound substantially the same > > as GSt then $$$$$ of dollars of gig files are useless to people that use > > GSt today. > > You forgot the akai users, the exs24 users, halion users, kontakt users, > nnxt(not sure about that name, the reason sampler), and roland users(old > hw samplers s-7xx). :) No, I didn't really. I just fundamentally don't want things to get overly complicated supporting all this stuff before GSt support works very well. 100% audio compatibility with GSt, then do whatever else you want as we grab lots of new users. - Mark |