Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] velocity (was: LinuxSampler BUGS to fix (Christian & others))

[Marek P. <ma...@na...>]

On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 04:53, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 19:46, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > > Ok, the latter might be a bug, I will check that. Regarding the 
> > > velocity<->volume mapping this is not yet implemented, but I will add that 
> > > next.
> > 
> > I wondered what would be the best way to implement it... how do other
> > samplers handle this issue?
> 
> This, I think, is pretty key. If people are using a library under GSt,
> and bring that library to LS, then they have a right to expect that it
> will sound substantially the same, and I think that if it doesn't, they
> won't continue to use LS.

Ok but the goal of linuxsampler isn't to clone gigasampler, it's just to
provide full gig support. :)
If the proposal i mentioned is ok and goes beyond Gst, that's only a
good thing(tm).

Marek