Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] velocity (was: LinuxSampler BUGS to fix (Christian & others))

[Marek P. <ma...@na...>]

> Ok, the latter might be a bug, I will check that. Regarding the 
> velocity<->volume mapping this is not yet implemented, but I will add that 
> next.

I wondered what would be the best way to implement it... how do other
samplers handle this issue?

I believe that both volume mapping and crossfading should be implemented
at the same time since they seem to correpsond to each other, consider
following situations:

layer1 is pp layer2 is mf layer3 is ff

+--layer1--+--layer2--+--layer3--+
+>>volume>>|>>volume>>|>>volume>>+

only volume is used.

+--layer1--+--layer2--+--layer3--+
+>>>>x-fade>>>>>|>>>>>x-fade>>>>>+

only x-fading is used, no volume changes

+--layer1---+---layer2---+--layer3--+
+>vol>|>x-fade>|>vol>|>x-fade>|>vol>|

both are used

So it seems that it would be very useful to have the possibility to
adjust the ranges of volumes/x-fades with respect to each other or to
turn off volumes or xfades. I think that they depend on each other. 

Marek