|
From: Mark K. <mar...@co...> - 2003-11-23 23:40:48
|
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 13:40, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Es geschah am Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 03:08 als Mark Knecht schrieb: > > I do not see much difference in terms of segfaults from the previous > > rev. It still dies after one or two notes as it did before. (Get up to a > > high voice count, let the voices die away so it all goes back to zero, > > then play a few notes and it crashes.) > > Sorry for answering that late; been very busy. You might have noticed, that > I've commited a couple of fixes in the last days. The segfault issue you > described should also be fixed now. Seems to be. Please see the response I wrote to Benno's email earlier today. > > > Anyway, with the MIDI input working again I played a bit with the new > > code. I don't have much good to report really. It does work now, in the > > sense that I get audio, but my sense (just from playing) was that > > somehow the sample choices it's making from a multi-sample/note library > > are not right. I got some very strange effects playing hard and soft. > > Yeah, Benno already told me that. Maybe there's a problem in the resolution of > the sample. > > > To study this a bit I ran the Bardstown piano through the MIDI velocity > > tests I had done earlier. This was the MIDI file supplied by Warren > > Trachtman. What I found was that volume is not varied at all over the > > complete range of MIDI velocities, while there seemed to be only 3 > > samples chosen out of the 4 in the library. This would seem to be a bug > > to me, but possibly not... > > Ok, the latter might be a bug, I will check that. Regarding the > velocity<->volume mapping this is not yet implemented, but I will add that > next. > Great! |