|
From: Benno S. <be...@ga...> - 2003-09-14 01:32:53
|
Scrive Josh Green <jg...@us...>: > > As for the GUI, evo is currently GUI-less but we will probably > > add a minimalistic load&play GUI (no sample editing), which > > permits you to load samples, assign them to various MIDI channels, > > perhaps storing performance data (you load a set of samples, > > assign them to midi channels, set volumes and some other basic > > parameters and save the setup, so that next time you can load > > the whole performance with a single command). > > > > Any interest in making an API that would allow this to be used with > other GUIs, such as Swami? Of course ! Since lately I gathered useful experience about the decoupling of GUI and engine, I'll add the same concepts to evo thus it will have a simple to use API (probably through a socket or form of IPC) and driving it from swami will become a breeze. Reusability of components anyone ? ;-) > Still trying to see if these projects can > work together on something. It would be cool to add LinuxSampler as a > wavetable soft synth to Swami. Yes this be ideal because you are probably becoming the reference sample library editor in the Linux field. Josh, Christian: about libgig and swami: I know swami is in C while libgig is in C++, but in order to avoid code duplication, would it make sense for swami to use libgig via C wrapper or do you think it would be easier to read and write GIG/DLS2 using your infrastructure that is already in place ? As said I'd like swami to become a fully fledged GIG/DLS2 editor that permit the creation of, access and edit that kind of sample libraries, without trying to fit them in a SF2 model. > I hope I can make it to the LAD ZKM 2004 Yes that will be cool, I'll be there too if LinuxSampler gets ready for that time (probably yes). Benno ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through http://www.gardena.net |