|
From: Steve H. <S.W...@ec...> - 2003-03-18 09:09:30
|
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:49:05PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 09:02, Steve Harris wrote: > > > > I've had a minor epiphany(sp?) having breifly used some subset of the > > swami/fluidsynth combo I'd say we are stupid to go it out own way, we > > should integrate with the existing stuff as far as possible. > > > > Using the swami UI made me realise just how much work has to go into it > > and it appears (from a cursory glance) to be basicly generic, rather than > > soundfont specific as I thought. > > > > - Steve > > Steve, > Hi. You've been a bit more quiet. Good to see you. Yes, I'm worried that the linuxsampler is one more thing than I can handle. I have a bunch of minor projects on the go that all require coding, and I find more inspirational than a sampler. I'm happy to supply DSP code and so on ofcourse, but I dont think I can contribute to the bulk of the coding. Especially if its in C++. But, yeah. All the developers on htis list should try swami before discussing development any further. - Steve |