|
From: Christian S. <chr...@ep...> - 2003-03-14 20:46:31
|
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:57:27 -0800 Mitchell <mgjohn@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Actually I have been experiencing similar frustrations. Also, I > don't really like the framework of the current distribution of > linuxsampler, since I would rather work in C (just a personal > preference), Why? Is it just because you're more used to C? Personally I think the OO way is cleaner and easier to read than having thousands of functions with cryptic names and data structures, especially as we will have a lot of data structures and functions working on them with actually simillar tasks. That's just predestined for inheritance. But I would not insist on it, at least if it will help to bring some progress. > and also I don't understand where they want to go with > the code so I haven't contributed anything or don't realy know how. I guess you already browsed the CVS repository (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxsampler/). If you want to be able to check in you have to register of course first to sf.net and Benno, Steve or Juan must then add you to the developers of the project. > I am on the very edge of writing my own sampler framework, so maybe > we could start our own homebrew and then later see what could be > incorporated back into linuxsampler. My thoughts, though I'm still hoping someone will reply. Regards, Christian |