From: Paul K. <pau...@ma...> - 2002-11-15 14:15:44
|
Benno Senoner <be...@ga...> wrote: > > > If each effect can be chained into the input of the next effect, one > > routable FX send may be enough. > > Sorry I am no expert here, but taking the usual reverb, chorus case I > don't think they can be chained , can they ? I think even some GM modules (Roland?) let you send some of the chorus output into the reverb. This is what I meant... instead of the effects being in series (which can also be useful, depending on the effects) the first effect is sent to the output *and* has a send level into the next effect. One example of where series effects (with no way of routing the signal from one effect to another) is not good enough is delay and reverb: You hear the signal with reverb, but then the delay repeats are dry - this sounds silly! > I think separate send and insert FXes should be supported. > They can be either stereo or mono (probably for insert FXes it makes > sense to keep them mono in the cases the sample sources are mono). ...except you might have a mono sample, but the pan of each voice might be random or track the keyboard, so unless you are applying effects to each voice individually (something the Native Instruments Kontakt sampler allows) inserts need stereo busses. Paul. _____________________________ m a x i m | digital audio http://mda-vst.com _____________________________ |