|
From: Benno S. <be...@ga...> - 2002-11-15 12:00:59
|
Hi, the shapes do look nice, I was wondering about two things: What the ideal coefficients would be so that very fast envelopes can be achieved while slower ones are smoothed out so that no zipper noise is audibile. BTW since in most of cases (in absence of envelopes) the LP smoothing is not needed, it would be wise to skip that code (to save cycles) when the envelope reached the final point (up to a very small epsilon since we are talking of exponentials). What do you suggest here ? Regarding adding a let's say resonant LP filter to the sample output: I guess the coefficients need to be smoothed out in some way too, otherwise zipper noise will probably show up again. I've found these interesting msgs on the saol-users list but I do not have a deep understanding of the things mentioned in these mails. http://sound.media.mit.edu/mpeg4/saol-users/0179.html http://sound.media.mit.edu/mpeg4/saol-users/0178.html What would a good tradeoff for achieving low-CPU usage zippernoise-free filter modulation would be ? (some kind of interpolation of precomputed coefficients ?) Benno On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 13:28, Steve Harris wrote: > Hi all, > > Benno and I were discussing envelope generation last night, I think that > the right way to generate an exponential envelope (I checked some synths > outputs too and it looks like this is that way its done) is to feed a > constant value into a LP filter with different parameters for each stage. > -- http://linuxsampler.sourceforge.net Building a professional grade software sampler for Linux. Please help us designing and developing it. |