From: Steve H. <S.W...@ec...> - 2002-11-05 22:39:52
|
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:04:04 +0100, Matthias Weiss wrote: > The situation of a context switch before the sampler finished its work > for the given jack cycle depends whether linuxsampler runs in > SCHED_FIFO mode and if there is a higher priority process preempting the > sampler process. This shouldn't happen within one jack graph, but it > could happen if there are parallel jack graphs. Its still a needless overhead. > In both cases, if linuxsampler is in-process of a host app (let's say a > sequencer) or if it's running in a seperate process there would be the > same context switch to another client. So the only benefit would be that > there is no process context switch between the host application and the > sampler, but still a thread context switch. Steve, does the cache > clearing also apply to thread switches? I dont know if it applies to threads as well. - Steve |