From: Steve H. <S.W...@ec...> - 2002-11-04 15:29:13
|
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 04:13:17 +0000, Phil Kerr wrote: > Quoting Steve Harris <S.W...@ec...>: > > > Of course, the counter argument too all this is that writing a full > > sampler engine for every format we want to support fully sucks, no-one > > probably needs all that functionlaity anyway, and we should just write > > translators ont a common, comprehensive format and live with the slight > > conversion loss. <shrug> > > Sounds like a job for DLS at the core and then have import/export modules > support Akai and other native sampler formats. > > We should be able to stream DLS in and out of the engine as well. I dont get the impression that DLS is anywhere near rich enough to do this job, it would need to be something pretty expressive. Gigasampler uses DLS 2 + proprietary extensions, doesn't it? - Steve |