|
From: RDP <gli...@gm...> - 2016-06-29 18:17:39
|
On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus <ro...@ga...> wrote: > On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate and suggest >> clear license terms by yourself which could become a candidate to resolve those overall >> issues. > Ok here it goes: I suggest to take the GPLv2. amend Section 1 with the > non commercial exception and change the name to LinuxSampler License. Might it not be a good idea for this discussion to be taken here, http://bb.linuxsampler.org/ .. with some drafts published ( wiki style ), so that such a beast can be formalised? Chris. |