Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] SFZ parse patch

[Andreas P. <and...@br...>]

Christian Schoenebeck wrote On 2014-02-28 15:44:
> On Friday 28 February 2014 13:09:39 Sergey wrote:
>> I've searched available SFZ specs and there is no official include
>> operator. So yes, it is my suggestion.
> 
> In general I think that extension makes sense, so I am not opposed to apply it 
> to the sampler. I just wonder whether a special prefix shall be used, 
> indicating a custom extension, to avoid a potential clash with an "official" 
> SFZ include statement that might be introduced in future.
> 
> What do our SFZ experts say? Andreas? Anders? Grigor?

Even though it isn't listed on their custom opcodes page, Aria seems to
have an include statement, as one of the instrument in the Free Sounds
for ARIA pack shows:

//and the files...
#include "BD.sfz"
#include "SD.sfz"
#include "LT.sfz"

So, I agree we can apply the patch, but it would be nice if it used the
same syntax as the Aria file uses.

/Andreas