|
From: David R. <d...@dr...> - 2012-01-28 01:38:36
|
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 01:41 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > On Tuesday 17 January 2012 17:05:07 David Robillard wrote: > > Aaaaaaand yet another state patch :) > > > > This one properly conforms to the state extension by using/preferring > > features passed to the state methods if they are present. It does not > > break anything (i.e. the ones passed to instantiate will still be used > > as before). > > Just commited. Thanks! Aaaaaaaaaaaand another one. Couple of minor screw-ups in the previous. -dr |