Re: [Linuxptp-users] Need clarification on sequence id

[Aditya V. <adi...@5g...>]

Got it. Thanks.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:39 PM Miroslav Lichvar <mli...@re...>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:33:31PM +0530, Aditya Venu via Linuxptp-users
> wrote:
> > I'm doing a two step time stamping and acting as a master. My doubt is:
> > Should the sequence ID for sync, followup, announce, delay req and delay
> > resp as shown in the screenshot be the same for one iteration?
>
> Only messages that are responses to other message are expected to have
> the same sequence ID. That is sync and follow_up, delay_req and
> delay_resp, and pdelay_req and pdelay_resp/pdelay_resp_follow_up.
>
> >
> > After the follow_up is received by the slave, will the immediate next
> > message from the slave be delay_request?
>
> No, delay requests are independent from sync/followup messages. There
> can be zero, one, or multiple delay requests between two sync
> messages.
>
> --
> Miroslav Lichvar
>
>

-- 


Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one 
of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.