Re: [Linuxptp-devel] ptp4l wrongly takes padding bytes as TLV?

[Richard C. <ric...@gm...>]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> I don't see reason why linuxptp should put hacks in place to workaround
> broken hardware that knowingly violates the spec. I don't even see a
> reason why the standard should be changed to accommodate such hardware
> with no real technical reasons ("we were lazy to implement the spec
> correctly and we just decided to violate the spec" is hardly a reason).

+1

Thanks,
Richard