Re: [Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

[Jiri B. <jb...@re...>]

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:32:54 -0700, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> In keeping with the principla of least surprise, I would say go with the
> flow and implement IPV6_V6ONLY.

You could also argue that "least surprise" means to respect whatever the
administrator set in the bindv6only sysctl. It's there for a reason and
applications should respect the setting, unless they have a very good
exceptional reason to do otherwise.

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc