Re: [Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

[Richard C. <ric...@gm...>]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:34:58PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> Whether or not ptp4l should set IPV6_V6ONLY unconditionally needs some
> more thinking, but my first impression is it would need to use IPv4
> multicast addresses (v4-mapped to IPv6) to send the packets to the v4
> hosts and not the IPv6 multicast addresses. This doesn't seem worth the
> complications and IPV6_V6ONLY looks like to be appropriate here. But
> somebody should think it through first :-)

Yes, we should add the socket option.  Patch anyone?

Thanks,
Richard