Re: [Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

[Gary E. M. <ge...@re...>]

Yo Jacob E!

On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:46:21 +0000
"Keller, Jacob E" <jac...@in...> wrote:

> > Any thing I missed?  Or can this be fixed?
> 
> I don't believe this is currently supportable,

Yup, currently broken.

> since we only create
> one clock for each instance of ptp4l, and that clock would be the one
> generating the ntpshm_segment.

Which is why I tried running two instances of ptp4l.  Fix the
config stuff and we are almost there.

When I dug a bit deeper I also found the IP address binding is not
quite right for multiple ptp4l instances.

Also, I see that I can put multiple interfaces on the ptp4l 
command line.  That can't work with just one clcok either.

> The "per-port" configuration is only
> useful when running the boundary clock mode, not for configuring
> different settings depending on what device is loaded.

So we agree the config file needs to be extended for SHM slave mode?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	ge...@re...  Tel:+1(541)382-8588