Re: [Linuxptp-users] sanity_freq_limit

[Miroslav L. <mli...@re...>]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:18:53AM +0000, Daniel Le wrote:
> > On Jun 18, 2015, at 2:58 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mli...@re...> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:58:13AM +0000, Daniel Le wrote:
> >> Additionally, in slave clock operation and software time stamping mode, how (and where in the code) ptp4l can be forced to step the system clock with the time it first receives from a grandmaster clock?
> > 
> > ptp4l should do that by default, it's set by the first_step_threshold
> > option.
> 
> Somehow when my system clock is initially (for example after a reboot) off the GM time by a couple of minutes, the master offset is huge and ptp4l takes hours to converge.

That's odd. Can you post your ptp4l config and log when it starts?

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar