Re: [Linuxptp-users] Expected throughput of the ptp4l

[Miroslav L. <mli...@re...>]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 05:32:38PM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:15:46PM +0000, Chandra Mallela wrote:
> > Could you elaborate your experience with the ptp4l performance?
> 
> I never tried 512 Syncs per second, nor do I see any reason to run
> such a high rate.  What is that supposed to achieve?

I'm wondering that too. Even if we assume a very unstable clock, the
clock resolution and jitter would have to be somewhere in low
picoseconds to -9 provide any theoretical improvement over -8.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar