Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Clarification of PHC and PHY on the supported lists?
PTP IEEE 1588 stack for Linux
Brought to you by:
rcochran
From: George Neville-N. <gn...@ne...> - 2013-12-02 22:15:15
|
On Dec 2, 2013, at 16:46 , Richard Cochran <ric...@gm...> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:37:28PM -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to determine why the hardware timestamping support table only lists PHC and not PHY >> timestamping. Testing on a system with an Intel 82576 NIC, I was unable, even with a very recent kernel (3.10) >> to get PHY level time stamping. > > Hi George, > > As you know, there are both MACs and PHYs on the market with hardware > time stamping and clock functionality. Linux supports both, but not at > the same time on the same port. Right now, the dp83640 is only PHY > driver in the kernel with time stamping and PHC supported. > > [ Looking at the table, I see that it really doesn't tell you whether > the part in question is a MAC or PHY. This can be improved. ] > > In order to allow PHY time stamping and PHC functions, the MAC driver > has to play along too, and not all MAC drivers can do this. So the > "PHY" column is really saying whether you can combine that MAC with a > PTP capable PHY or not. The PTP MACs all have "NA" (Not Applicable) > because you cannot have time stamping in both the MAC and the PHY. > > Your card, the 82576, does support MAC time stamping and PHC > functions, at it should work in 3.10 kernel. But even if you combine > it with a PTP capable PHY (like the dp83640), the PHY time stamping > won't work. > >> Do I need to build a custom kernel for this to work? > > To support time stamping in the PHY, your kernel needs to have option > CONFIG_NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING enabled. Since this adds extra checks > into the hot path, probably no distro kernel will turn it on. So, yes, > you will have to recompile if you want PHY time stamping. (And you > will also need the dp83640 combined with a MAC in the table for which > PHY=Y.) > Thanks for the detailed reply. I think I get it now. BTW You might just cut/paste your response to me into the Wiki. Best, George |