Re: [Linuxptp-users] Feature enhancement for more comfortable usually interaction with a script language or other applications

[Stephan G. <ste...@gm...>]

> I mean to keep this interface as the one and only way of controlling
> ptp4l at run time. Other ways have been defined to control a PTP
> service, like SNMP. If we ever support these, then it will be as a
> separate program to handle SNMP requests and translate them into
> management packets on the local UDS interface.
> 
> So, I do view the UDS interface as "stable".

Than it probably makes sense to go for the UDS interface. Some 
information like master_offset are updated very often. So it doesn't 
always make sense to run a script if "something" changes.

Regards,

Stephan