Re: [Linuxptp-users] Which distributions have native ptp support?

[Gabe B. <Gab...@jd...>]

I am using the version that comes with a fresh install of the RH 6.4 release:

rpm -qa | grep ptp
linuxptp-0-0.6.20121114gite6bbbb.el6.x86_64

ptp4l doesn't appear to have a version option (in this release) and the readme file in /usr/shar/doc/linuxptp-0/README.org doesn't either.  

At any rate, I will get the latest version and try that and report.

Thank you for the feedback!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keller, Jacob E [mailto:jac...@in...]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 4:37 PM
> To: Gabe Black
> Cc: Ledda William EXT; lin...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Which distributions have native ptp
> support?
> 
> What version of linuxPTP are you using?
> 
> It appears you aren't using the 1.3 version as we moved to a method for
> obtaining the Tx timestamp that uses the poll() call. That might fix
> your issue.
> 
> The other option would be to increase the tx_timestamp_timeout value,
> but I think moving to the newest Linux PTP should be a fix.
> 
> Regards,
> Jake
> 
> On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 21:35 +0000, Gabe Black wrote:
> > Nm, it was right.  We have two subnets that will route to the
> meinberg, and they both work...  So that means I still  I don't know
> what it is...
> >
> > strace it shows:
> > sendto(11,
> >
> "\1\2\0,\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2406\237\377\376\30*\213\0\1\
> > 0\0"..., 44, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(319),
> > sin_addr=inet_addr("224.0.1.129")}, 16) = \
> > 44
> > Followed by a bunch of:
> >
> > recvmsg(11, 0x7fff67459250, MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
> temporarily unavailable)
> > nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL)              = 0
> > recvmsg(11, 0x7fff67459250, MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
> temporarily unavailable)
> > nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL)              = 0
> > recvmsg(11, 0x7fff67459250, MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
> temporarily unavailable)
> > nanosleep({0, 1000}, NULL)              = 0
> > recvmsg(11, 0x7fff67459250, MSG_ERRQUEUE) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
> > temporarily unavailable) ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gabe Black
> > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 2:20 PM
> > > To: Gabe Black; 'Keller, Jacob E'
> > > Cc: 'Ledda William EXT'; 'lin...@li...'
> > > Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] Which distributions have native ptp
> > > support?
> > >
> > > Oh sheesh.. I had a typo and was on the wrong subnet...
> > >
> > > It is working now!
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gabe Black
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:18 PM
> > > > To: 'Keller, Jacob E'
> > > > Cc: Ledda William EXT; lin...@li...
> > > > Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] Which distributions have native ptp
> > > > support?
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Keller, Jacob E [mailto:jac...@in...] You
> > > > > shouldn't have to, however, I would suggest disabling EEE
> > > > > support, as this has been known to cause issues on the i350
> > > > >
> > > > > ethtool --set-eee device eee off
> > > > >
> > > > > This should fix your issue, if not please me know.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the reply.
> > > >
> > > > That option does not appear to be available with the stock igb
> > > > driver of RH6.4
> > > >
> > > > [root@ network-scripts]# ethtool -i eth3
> > > > driver: igb
> > > > version: 4.0.1-k
> > > > firmware-version: 0.1470, 0x05fc8000 ...
> > > > [root@ network-scripts]# ethtool --show-eee eth3 Cannot get EEE
> > > > settings: Operation not supported
> > > >
> > > > Is there another way to disable EEE? Or would not having that
> > > > option in ethtool mean it is off?
> > > >
> > > > Gabe
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 15:29 +0000, Gabe Black wrote:
> > > > > > Hi William,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I installed redhat 6.4 and have the intel i350 (with igb
> > > > > > driver)
> > > > and
> > > > > am having trouble getting it to work with a meinberg master.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The output I get is:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ptp4l[246980.523]: selected /dev/ptp1 as PTP clock
> > > > > > ptp4l[246980.525]: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on
> > > INITIALIZE
> > > > > > ptp4l[246980.526]: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on
> > > INITIALIZE
> > > > > > ptp4l[246980.773]: port 1: new foreign master
> > > > > > 00606e.fffe.7c230e-
> > > 1
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.014]: selected best master clock
> > > > > > 00606e.fffe.7c230e
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.014]: foreign master not using PTP timescale
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.014]: running in a temporal vortex
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.014]: port 1: LISTENING to UNCALIBRATED on
> > > > > > RS_SLAVE
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.989]: recvmsg tx timestamp failed: Resource
> > > > temporarily
> > > > > > unavailable
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.989]: port 1: send delay request failed
> > > > > > ptp4l[246985.989]: port 1: UNCALIBRATED to FAULTY on
> > > > > > FAULT_DETECTED
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did you have to do anything differently on the stock RH6.4
> > > install
> > > > > > to
> > > > > get it to work?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Gabe
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Ledda William EXT [mailto:Wil...@it...]
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:02 AM
> > > > > > > To: Richard Cochran; Gabe Black
> > > > > > > Cc: lin...@li...
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-users] Which distributions have
> > > > > > > native ptp support?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm currently using RH 6.4 with Intel i350 (igb driver)
> with
> > > > > success
> > > > > > > (no need to recompile the kernel). About RH 6.5 I know that
> > > > > > > there will be many improvements, more eth driver supported,
> > > > > > > and it should include version 1.3 of linuxptp package.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > William
> > > > > > >
> >
>