From: Richard C. <ric...@gm...> - 2013-08-12 09:23:18
|
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:40:51AM -0700, David Gravereaux wrote: > On 08/12/2013 12:55 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > > I guess wireshark is noticing the missing follow up information TLV. > > Using the configuration file (or setting option follow_up_info) should > > cure this. > > > Yes and no. With follow_up_info=0, it attempts to sync. No attempt to > sync without it. Guess I'll be doing more phone calls to Netgear tomorrow But is wireshark happy now? Can you post the output from ptp4l? BTW, - If ptp4l is the master, it sends follow ups (plus info). - If ptp4l is slave, it consumes follow ups (plus info). Thanks, Richard |