Re: [Linuxptp-users] HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC vs HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

[Miroslav L. <mli...@re...>]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> FYI, the i210 should have hardware support for doing onestep (no one
> enabled it) and it could be configured to do either sync, or p2p delay,
> but I don't believe it could do both. The i210 is configured by putting
> in an offset of where in the packet you want the timestamp to go, but
> you can't store different types of packets so it wouldn't work for P2P
> packets.

Just curious, would it be possible to use the launch time feature of
i210 to do onestep in software?

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar