Re: [Linuxptp-users] HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC vs HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

[Richard C. <ric...@gm...>]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:51:58AM +0000, Ledda William EXT wrote:

> My question is: which is the real difference between HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
> and HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC? I mean, what problems could I have if
> I use a modified version without the HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC
> support?

This is just a number passed in the tx_type field of the SIOCSHWTSTAMP
ioctl. It is only used if you set configuration option "twoStepFlag"
to false. So there is no harm in defining it in EXTRA_CFLAGS or in
missing.h.

Thanks,
Richard