From: Libor P. <lpe...@su...> - 2013-06-03 09:32:05
|
On Thu 30-05-13 19:34:45, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote: > What is : > ptp4l[234.056]: poll tx timestamp failed: No such file or directory The above is partly garbage. Please apply 7b02a5e (fix misleading pr_err on poll timeout) to your sources. > ptp4l[234.056]: port 1: send delay request failed That merely means that message could not be sent due to the missing time stamping capability. > and how is it different than : > ptp4l[106753.952]: poll tx timestamp failed: Success > ptp4l[106753.952]: port 1: send sync failed It's the same situation at different place in the code, just the error message is different. Perhaps more intuitive messages are worth inventing. > ptp4l[106753.952]: port 1: MASTER to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED) > > that I was seeing on MASTER side before skb_tx_timestamp(skb) was > inserted in the driver ? As to my understanding also the receiving needs time stamping in the driver. Please update to the latest linuxptp development version before proceeding with your testing. Libor |