Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 3/5] gptp: minimal support

[Richard C. <ric...@gm...>]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:44:15AM +0200, Delio Brignoli wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > This code is on the receive path. The sender has sent a one step
> > packet. What harm is there in processing it?
> 
> The patch does not skip processing it, it forces a two_step sync (i.e. expects and process a follow_up) as per 802.1AS.

Can you please explain his this forces the master to send a two step sync?

Thanks,
Richard