Re: [Linuxptp-users] Problems with hardware time stamping with PHY DP83640 on MCP5200 powerpc platform

[Richard C. <ric...@gm...>]

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:33:54PM +0200, Mario Molitor wrote:
> 
> I have another question to use always layer 2 for status frame.
> Is this always necessary?
> Because I think UDP/IPv4 status frames should also possible.
> 
> I could change this for our tests. What do you think about this?

I am not sure what you mean. The PHY status frames are L2, but this
has nothing to do with the actual PTP messages, which can be L2 or L4
in any case.

HTH,
Richard