Re: [LHA-misc] FW: Info

[Brian <br...@fu...>]

At 09:03 AM 3/28/2002 -0500, Mike Baptiste wrote:
>expensive.  And that is the key - CeBus is expensive.  Getting chipsets
>is expensive.  And due to the complexity of the system, anything that
>uses it is bound to be expensive due to teh development effort and CPU
>horsepower required.

And CeBus share([s|d]) many of the same noise and interference problems as 
X-10.

>becomes less useful.  Sure it coudl transmit over wireless, AC, twisted
>pair, etc.

So can any protocol.  The physical layer choices aren't exclusive to CeBus.