Re: SV: [LHA-misc] RFI/EMI with Home Automation devices
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
ncherry
From: Clay J. <cl...@nw...> - 2001-04-23 16:09:49
|
I'd be surprised if there weren't at least SOME 'issues' with ANYTHING in= the 2.4GHz range and the Gigaset. I may be way off base here, but I don't beleive Bluetooth a= ctually specifies a particular frequency range - I thought it was just a software spec. Clay =C5ke Hedman wrote: > Do you think this will be a problem with bluetooth as well as it is als= o in the 2.4GHz band? > > /Ake > > =C5ke Hedman, YAP (Yet Another Programmer) http://www.brattberg.com/ake > ak...@us... <mailto:ak...@us...> > CC Systems AB, Box 83, 822 22 ALFTA, Sweden > Phone: +46 271 19380, Fax: +46 271 19389 > Direct: +46 271 19209, Celluar: +46 70 2314980 > Projects: http://eda.sourceforge.net http://mumin.sourceforge.net > Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero > > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fr=E5n: lin...@li... > [mailto:lin...@li...]F=F6r Clay Jackson > Skickat: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:08 AM > Till: lin...@li... > =C4mne: [LHA-misc] RFI/EMI with Home Automation devices > > Being an Amateur Radio Operator ('Ham'), I think I'm probably a bit mor= e 'in > tune' (intended pun, there) with potential RF interference (aka RFI, or= EMI) > than most; and, my radio shack (also server room, telecom switch room a= nd > home office) is definitely a 'high RF' environment. But, I still got '= bit', > and since it involved Home Automation, I thought I share my experiences= so > someone else doesn't have to learn quite as much as I did... > > I've got a Siemens "Gigaset" phone system, which consists of a base uni= t and > 4 remotes which are cordless. The system uses Spread Spectrum Technolo= gy > (meaning it's transmit/receive frequencies CHANGE) in the 2.4 Ghz range. > The base unit is hung on the wall behind my monitor (until I get around= to > moving my ISDN TA, which feeds the phone lines into the GigaSet - at wh= ich > point the base unit will move to a phone panel in the garage). > > At a hamfest a few weeks ago, I got a great deal on 4 X10 'XCams', alon= g > with the receiver and other goodies. I started setting up the XCams th= is > weekend and discovered that if the camera was more than 2' from the > receiver, I got LOUSY reception, or none at all. After sratching my he= ad > for a while, I unplugged the Gigaset (thereby interrupting all of our p= hone > service execpt our backup 'POTS' - my wife sometimes hates my gadgets),= and > presto, the XCams started working just fine. Turns out the Gigaset and= the > XCams share the same frequency allocation - and the Siemens people want= to > 'own' the whole band (interestingly enough, there was NEVER any interfe= rence > TO the Gigaset phones FROM the Cameras, just the other way 'round. > > So, I plugged the Gigaset back in and opened up the X10 receiver. I > discovered that it had an F type connector (ala cable TV) on the back, = for > channel 3/4 out. I clipped the lead from the oscillator to the connect= or, > and connected the (input) antenna lead to the F connector. Then, I too= k a > piece of coax cable (RG6, for the purists out there), stipped the inner > conductor, and wrapped it around the antenna of a camera about 50' from= the > receiver. Presto - hard wired video! > > Tonite, I'm gonna open up one of the cameras and see if I can figure ou= t how > to more permanently mount a cable - also, there's a thinner 75 ohm cabl= e out > there that I'm gonna try as well. I figure that since only one camera= is > powered at a time, a regular cable TV splitter will probably work OK fo= r > feeding signals from multiple cameras into one receiver. > > I'll keep the list posted on my results - and, as soon as I get a web s= erver > up, I'll put pictures of the whole mess up as well. > > Thought this might be interesting for other folks who are starting to d= abble > in wireless stuff around the home - turns out that the same frequencies= are > being used (or proposed) for all SORTS of 'consumer' gadgets. And, of > course, the manufacturers are taking a 'caveat emptor' approach the the > whole problem.... > > Clay Jackson > N7QNM > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxha-misc > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe Linuxha-misc" > in the body of a message to Lin...@li... > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxha-misc > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe Linuxha-misc" > in the body of a message to Lin...@li... |