From: Adrian M. <ad...@mc...> - 2003-04-20 19:57:58
|
On Sunday 20 April 2003 19:46, you wrote: > On Sunday 20 April 2003 20:45, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > > Did you build these libraries yourself? I am coming to the view that = it > > is actually the glibc on the distro that is stuffed-up rather than th= e > > tools... > > Do you speak about these libs ? : > > libdl.so.2 =3D> /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x2957c000) > > libm.so.6 =3D> /lib/libm.so.6 (0x2958f000) > > libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x295d3000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 =3D> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x29556000) > > These are ones that you found on the DCLinux-010603, without changes. > There are other libs in my X-devel-kit, but they are not used here ... > > Maybe, your problem comes from the dynamic loader... > > I failed (or gave up, as you want) on building a X-devel-kit > specially for the DCLinux-010603 (binutils-2.11.90.0.7, gcc-3.1-2001050= 1, > glibc-2.2.2, ...). If someone successfully build it, please contact me = !!! > > C=E9dric Can I ask why you built linx as static if you have these libraries workin= g? |