From: Daniel S. <ds...@tr...> - 2003-04-20 11:48:56
|
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:46:01PM +0100, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > On Sunday 20 April 2003 12:40, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hmm, maybe the gcc3.2 sh4 relocation types are broken somewhere? >=20 > Well I am using gcc-3.0.4. I have to say compiler code (like much else :-= >) is=20 > beyond me... Oh. Should be fine with 3.2. No idea beyond that, sorry. :\ --=20 Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.ed= u.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne |