From: Adrian M. <ad...@mc...> - 2003-04-20 11:46:28
|
On Sunday 20 April 2003 12:40, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hmm, maybe the gcc3.2 sh4 relocation types are broken somewhere? Well I am using gcc-3.0.4. I have to say compiler code (like much else :-= >) is=20 beyond me... |