From: Adrian M. <ad...@mc...> - 2003-04-20 11:34:59
|
On Friday 18 April 2003 21:48, VINCENT C=E9dric wrote: > On Friday 18 April 2003 21:22, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > > I have asked this a few times and never really got an answer. Is anyb= ody > > else using gcc with glibc as their cross-compiler/C lib combination. = If > > so, are they able to build shared executibles? > > > > I don't seem to be able to (using gcc-3.0.4) > > > > Adrian > > I've successfully compiled (with Bill's Gatliff "emblindc" environment)= as > shared and static these apps/libs : > > gpm-1.20.0 with ncurses support (1.20.1 don't seem to compile correctly= =2E..) > libpng-1.2.5 > libtiff-3.6.0-beta (this is the only version that I was able to compile= as > shared library for linux-sh4) > ncurses-5.3 with gpm support. > gpm-1.19.6 with ncurses support. > zlib-1.1.4 > libpng-1.0.12 (I can't compile links-2.1pre7 with libpng-1.2.1...) > libjpeg.v6b > libtiff-v3.5.7 > links-2.1pre7 with framebuffer, png, tiff, jpeg, javascript and gpm sup= port > Thanks again. Just to come back on this - and for the avoidance of doubt - when you say= you=20 compiled them - you were able to run them also? I have no problem compili= ng=20 the apps, it's running them that is difficult - they seg fault. And if so, could I encourage you to compile mpg123 (as a reference app) a= nd=20 see if you can run that as shared? What setup are you using for all this? Ie where do you get the libraries = you=20 link with? (Is it the debian unstable on m17n?) Slainte Adrian |