Re: [linuxdc-dev] vmufs question

[Ben S. <sr...@cs...>]

Whats the deal with the website?

Ben

-- 
Ben Srour
sr...@cs...

On Thu, 21 Nov 2002 ad...@mc... wrote:

> mr...@0x... wrote:
> > * Adrian McMenamin <ad...@mc...> on Thu, Nov 21, 2002:
> > > In the vmu all the game files are loaded into the vmu from block 0. Other=
> > =20
> > > files can be loaded anywhere.
> > >=20
> > > Should I implement this in the vmufs driver - ie should I force game file=
> > s=20
> > > (those with the eXec bit on) to be loaded into the vmu from block 0.
> > >=20
> > > Reasons for: unless this behaviour is enforced it will not be possible to=
> >  use=20
> > > vmufs to swap games files.
> > >=20
> > > Reasons against: could cuase problems loading the vmu with additional fil=
> > es,=20
> > > mixes questions of policy with mechanisms.
> > >=20
> > > What do people think?
> > >=20
> > Isn't the whole point of vmufs to stay compatible with official Dreamcast
> > software?
> > M. R.
> >
> Isn't the point to stay compatible with the format not simply
> the software? If I follow the Sega way then you woin't be able to
> save more than two executibles on a vmu, say.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxdc-dev mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxdc-dev
>