Re: [linuxdc-dev] vmufs question

[<ad...@mc...>]

mr...@0x... wrote:
> * Adrian McMenamin <ad...@mc...> on Thu, Nov 21, 2002:
> > In the vmu all the game files are loaded into the vmu from block 0. Other=
> =20
> > files can be loaded anywhere.
> >=20
> > Should I implement this in the vmufs driver - ie should I force game file=
> s=20
> > (those with the eXec bit on) to be loaded into the vmu from block 0.
> >=20
> > Reasons for: unless this behaviour is enforced it will not be possible to=
>  use=20
> > vmufs to swap games files.
> >=20
> > Reasons against: could cuase problems loading the vmu with additional fil=
> es,=20
> > mixes questions of policy with mechanisms.
> >=20
> > What do people think?
> >=20
> Isn't the whole point of vmufs to stay compatible with official Dreamcast
> software?
> M. R.
> 
Isn't the point to stay compatible with the format not simply 
the software? If I follow the Sega way then you woin't be able to
save more than two executibles on a vmu, say.