Re: [linuxdc-dev] hi

[M. R. B. <mr...@0x...>]

* Lorant Toth <Lor...@gm...> on Wed, Nov 06, 2002:

> Ok, that is the problem, I see ;)
>=20
> I guess that means there is not such a toolchain. Is the SH/4 anyway SH/3=
=20
> compliant or does it have a different instruction set?
> I guess you already know that there is no such toolchain as described but=
=20
> if you're not sure I could *try* looking ;)
>=20

Such a toolchain exists, but we're having a hell of a time getting it to do
what we want (building/running shared executables).  GCC 3.2 + binutils
2.13 are what we're currently working with.

M. R.